Emina Bektas vs Francesca Curmi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Apr at 10:57 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Bektas vs F. Curmi

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

MLT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bektas 1 - 0 Curmi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Emina Bektas winning 2 and Francesca Curmi winning 0. The last match between Emina Bektas and Francesca Curmi was at the W75 Calvi, 18-04-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Emina Bektas getting the victory 7-6(1) 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bektas | 1 |
| Curmi | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W75 Calvi(04-18-25)
E. Bektas vs F. Curmi H2H Profile
E. Bektas vs F. Curmi Match Preview:
What can we glean from their recent form when it comes to second serve performance? Over the last six months, Bektas has shown more prowess, winning 45.19% of his points on the second serve. Curmi, on the other hand, trails with a success rate of 40.74%. This statistic is often a good indicator of match outcomes. Could this edge influence the day's match?
Now let’s turn the spotlight on their return game stats. Bektas has been winning 50.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Curmi is slightly behind at 48.04%. Interestingly, when it comes to first serve returns, Curmi surpasses Bektas by winning 36.76%, compared to Bektas's 26.01%. These figures can be critical in predicting who might have the upper hand in their head-to-head matchup.
The ability to handle pressure situations is crucial in a tennis match. Bektas has been able to save 49.7% of breakpoints faced, whereas Curmi's save percentage is at 46.55%. Such stats illustrate a player's fortitude under pressure and could sway the momentum in close games.
In terms of performance over the past year, Bektas has claimed victory in 51.79% of his matches, with a win-loss record of 29-27. Curmi has been more successful with a win percentage of 58% from a record of 29-21. This performance overview can offer a snapshot of both players' consistency.
Analyzing surface-specific stats, both players shine on hard courts. Bektas has a career win rate of 60% on hard surfaces (187-125), while Curmi boasts an even higher rate of 68% (78-37). Conversely, clay has proven to be Bektas's weakest surface with 41% (15-22), while Curmi fares better on clay with a 57% winning rate (64-48). Might this advantage on hard courts play a crucial role in their upcoming duel?
Player level and opponent quality provide further insights. Bektas played most of his matches in Challenger/ITF tournaments > $10K, securing wins 67.74% of the time. Curmi, competing largely at the same level, holds a 59.57% win rate. Interestingly, the average rank of Bektas’ opponents over the last year has been 226.89, compared to Curmi’s average opponent rank of 329.7. Such differences might impact the perception of previous performance levels between the two.
If the match stretches to a deciding set, Bektas emerges as the more reliable performer, having won 69% of deciding sets in the past year. Curmi has a lower success rate in such scenarios, standing at 50%. This stat could heavily impact live betting decisions.
As the event unfolds, real-time performance becomes essential to predict the outcome. Not only are past statistics vital, but current form and performance in the ongoing event should not be overlooked. Finally, Curmi holds a slender advantage in breakpoint conversion, boasting a 36.56% success rate compared to Bektas's 34.04%. Such a high-stakes stat is often pivotal in turning the tide during tight matches.
With all these statistics laid out, Bektas seems to hold the edge in terms of second serve prowess and deciding set performance. However, Curmi's superior first serve return success and slight edge in breakpoint conversion can't be ignored. All factors considered, Curmi might have the better chance to clinch this contest, especially if he capitalizes on his strengths when it matters the most.
Emina Bektas vs Francesca Curmi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Bektas vs F. Curmi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:36:38 | Average Match Time | 1:36:38 |
| 73% (46/63) | 1st Serve % | 61% (39/64) |
| 67% (31/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (19/39) |
| 59% (10/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (9/25) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 56% (36/64) | Return Points Win % | 35% (22/63) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Bektas Recent Matches Played
F. Curmi Recent Matches Played

E. Bektas vs F. Curmi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0/0) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.06% (185/118) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.31% (414/284) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 54.67% (3497/2900) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.12% (80/41) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.78% (78/57) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.45% (27/20) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 98 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 522 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:26:17 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 452.78 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 72% (11954/16668) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (6941/11954) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2125/4714) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1144/2248) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 48% (8129/16966) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 57.36% (113/84) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 70.00% (70/30) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (183/299) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (27/52) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (46/90) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (182/157) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (182/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (121/27) |